Television has long and firmly entered our life, and each of us can no longer imagine even a day of our life without our favorite TV programs or films. And situations often arise when an individual antenna must be installed to obtain a high-quality picture or a large number of channels. And this is where difficulties of both legal and technical nature may arise.

Our article will help you understand all the intricacies of installing an individual antenna both on a private house and on the one you are a resident of.

Before talking about how to mount an antenna on the roof of a house, you need to understand what types of antennas exist. Today, the most common are:

• Wave;
• Satellite;
• Cellular.

Wave antennas, in turn, are subdivided into all-wave and digital television antennas. The first ones are universal, since they are tuned to receive channels in both the meter and decimeter ranges. Satellite antennas are presented in the form of well-known "dishes", which may differ in size and material.

This is how the installed satellite dishes look

There is a regularity: the larger the diameter of the satellite dish, the better the received signal will be.
Of the materials for the manufacture of a satellite dish, the most common are plastic, aluminum, steel and mesh material. Of all these materials, plastic and steel are the least resistant to aggressive environmental factors.

In terms of reception quality, steel antennas are in no way inferior to aluminum ones, but due to the fragility of the steel antenna, they are practically not used today.

Plastic antennas also received a lot of negative feedback from consumers: under the influence of sunlight and temperature drops, the plastic was deformed, and the signal quality deteriorated. Therefore, plastic antennas are also not widely used. A feature of mesh antennas is their mobility. Mesh mirrors can be dismantled from its surface and ensure complete safety during transportation.

However, such antennas are lightweight with a large area of ​​the "dish", which contributes to an increase in their windage level, which means that it is necessary that they have an extremely reliable mount. Finally, the cellular antenna. Its installation must be coordinated with many departments.

And without their written opinion and permission, the installation of cellular antennas on the roofs of multi-apartment residential buildings is prohibited.

Today, a frequently discussed issue is the effect of a cellular antenna on human health. There is still no definite answer, and the courts are increasingly considering claims to dismantle cellular antennas from the roof of a residential building. And I must say that most of these claims are satisfied.

The legal aspect of installing an individual antenna

If you plan to install on, then everything is simple here.

You do not need to obtain permits for this procedure, since you are the owner of this building.
If the installation of the antenna is planned on the roof of an apartment building, then certain difficulties may arise with this. To avoid them, you need to stock up on the knowledge of the laws of the Russian Federation in advance, from which it follows that:

• you, as the owner of a single apartment in an apartment building, are at the same time a co-owner of the entire house as a whole, including such premises as the basement, attic, and also including the roof;
• the keys to these premises of residential buildings must be in the department of the ZhEK and issued to homeowners at their first request.

From the foregoing, it follows that you have every right to use the territory of the basement, attic, as well as the roof to your advantage. But at the same time, it should be remembered that you do not live in the house alone, and therefore you should obtain written consent to mount the antenna equipment from the rest of the residents of the house.

Read also

Installation and installation of a gable roof of a house

Antenna Installation Permission

If there are any problems with the housing office (they prohibit the installation of the antenna, do not provide an opportunity to get to the installation site, etc.), you should refer to the Housing Code of the Russian Federation, as well as to the Constitution, where your rights to use and free access to ancillary premises of the house.

Safety rules for installing the antenna on the roof of the house

When your actions are coordinated with the rest of the residents of the house and with the housing office, you can start installing the antenna on the roof of the house. In this case, you should remember the basic safety rules when performing work on installing the antenna:

Choosing a place for mounting the antenna on the roof

It is known that the quality of signal reception will depend on the location of the antenna installation. Here are some tips for choosing where to mount your antenna equipment on your rooftop.

Tools Needed for Antenna Mounting

In order to mount the antenna equipment with your own hands, you must have the following tools at hand:

• a hammer drill to help you mount the antenna bracket to the outside wall of your home (or other vertical surface);
• hammer for driving dowels into holes;
• a screwdriver to screw in screws or bolts;
• wire cutters for cutting cables.

In addition to the tools that are used to directly mount the antenna on the roof or wall of the house, you will also need:

• receiver;
• small portable TV;
• compass.

The latest tools will help you to independently adjust the antenna.

Antenna mounting algorithm

The installation process of antenna equipment is reduced to the following algorithm:

Television has long ceased to be considered a luxury - it is quite a common need of a modern person. Of course, now almost everyone can watch a movie or turn on a cartoon for a child on the Internet, but anyway, any of us have a TV in our house. This article will discuss how to fix the antenna on the roof of the house yourself.

What's worth and not to worry about

If we take the whole situation, then there should be no installation problems. The only thing is that if you live in an apartment building and want to install a satellite dish for yourself, then there may be problems with housing departments or even with neighbors - but this happens very rarely, you need to be not on the best terms with everyone, to put it mildly, so that someone was against your antenna.

But if, nevertheless, someone will be interested in “putting a spoke in the wheel,” then you should know that, according to the law, you have the right to use part of the attic area, basement and roof, like every resident of a high-rise building. Naturally, without prejudice to each other's rights. If the claims are unfounded, then you may well go to court.

It is good when the installation of the antenna is planned on the roof of a private house - in the village or in the countryside at the dacha. Then there are no problems at all and no one can prohibit you from installing an antenna in order to enjoy high-quality TV.

Choosing a place to install the antenna

We will talk about a private house, but the installation recommendations in general can be applied in the same way when installing on the roof of a multi-storey building. Only before you many antennas could have been installed there, and they will interfere with each other - therefore they need to be placed in a checkerboard pattern.

In order for the antenna to perfectly catch waves and receive a signal, it must be installed at the highest point. At a distance of 30-40 meters around the antenna there should be no obstacles - this is the most open space, where there are no tall houses or trees. Otherwise, the signal, of course, will be, but its instability will become slightly annoying. A good place for an antenna is the ridge of the roof. A mast is also often used.

Important: do not forget about safety measures when working on the roof - it is better to take at least one assistant for yourself, and if the installation takes place on a pitched roof, then you must use a belt for belay.

If the antenna is planned to be installed on a flat roof, which happens infrequently, then it is better to mount it at the very edge. But usually, this is a gable roof - then the installation should take place on the slope, the side of which "looks" into the courtyard of the house.

Installing the antenna on the roof of a private house

It is better to immediately stock up on the necessary tools and auxiliary material - it is not very convenient to deliver it all in the process and as needed to the roof.

The tool you need to mount the antenna:

Dowels, screws and bolts

Drill or hammer drill

Cable cutters

Screwdriver

Metal rope

Sealant

You also need to determine exactly where the antenna will be located on the roof. When the place is selected, a special mark is made on the roof, then you can proceed with the installation.

Basic step-by-step actions:

Where you put the mark, you need to drill holes with a drill.

Depending on the angle of inclination, either a mast or an antenna bracket is attached to the holes.

Fasten the structure with anchors, fixing it well on the roof.

Thus, you have secured the mast - then you need to attach the antenna itself to it. This is done using the fasteners that come with the mast. It is important here to tighten all the bolts and fastening elements as tightly as possible - how well the antenna will pick up the signal in case of rain, snow and other manifestations of bad weather depends on this.

Important: if the roof of your house is covered with soft tiles, ondulin roofing material or other soft material, then experts strongly do not recommend drilling holes in such a coating - in such cases, it would be best to attach the structure to the front of the house.

When the antenna installation is successfully completed, you must take care of the stability of the mast. If it is too long (more than one and a half meters), then in a strong wind it will stagger in different directions and can completely tear it off. It is advisable to immediately secure it securely with a metal cable or wire. Of these, you need to make at least three stretch marks, bolting them to the strongest parts of the roof. Usually the "helpers" in this matter are the rafters or the ridge. The stretch marks should be placed in a circle at an even distance from each other.

Briefly about the types of antennas

Now you know that there is nothing difficult in installing the antenna yourself - it remains to decide which one you want. Now the most popular are satellite dishes - the so-called dishes. They are full of all the balconies and roofs of city houses, they are also widely used in rural areas. In addition to them, there are also all-wave and digital TV antennas. We will consider each option separately, and you already choose the one that is most suitable for your area, and can also meet your needs.

A little about security measures

Finally, a few words about how to protect yourself while working on the roof of the house. Compliance with these rules is very important!

Under no circumstances try to install the antenna alone - take one or two people as your assistants, they will insure you in case of something.

When installing the antenna on the roof, use rubber boots and gloves - there may be electrical wires on the roof.

Wear special belay equipment at height, especially if you are working on a roof slope.

Do not rush to climb onto the roof if it does not show TV during rain or snow - this is not always a problem with the antenna. Usually, when the weather improves, the broadcast returns to normal.

Now you can safely start installing the antenna on your roof and enjoy. And if you still doubt whether or not there is time for this, then you can always call a team of craftsmen who will do everything quickly and without problems for a certain fee.

Video

Modern houses are equipped with a lot of different equipment, which is perceived by a person as a necessity. External antennas are used to amplify the signal of household appliances, such as a TV. The roof is the best place to install a signal booster, as it is usually the highest point in the area.

However, installing an antenna on a roof can present legal and practical difficulties. In this article, we will tell you how to self-install additional equipment on pitched and flat roofs.

Often people, having settled in an apartment or their own house, find themselves in a situation where, due to a weak signal, their TV “does not catch” most of the channels, showing only interference. It happens that the reason for such problems is that the structure is located in a lowland, and the surrounding buildings or trees make it difficult to receive the signal. To get the TV set up, an antenna installation is required, which is usually done from the roof. Here the situation can develop in 2 scenarios:

• Owners of private houses can install any necessary equipment on their roofs without obtaining any additional permission from the authorities. Difficulties can arise only if the house is located in the historical part of the city and is subject to restrictions on the installation of equipment on the facades and roofs of buildings of the "red" line.
• For apartment owners in apartment buildings, the process of installing an antenna that amplifies the signal begins with obtaining permission. They have the right to legally install a household, however, for this it is necessary to submit a petition to the municipal maintenance service, obtain a permit, and then proceed with the installation.

Note! Municipal authorities can impose their own restrictions on the installation of television antennas on the roofs of houses. They may refuse due to the fact that, for technical reasons or due to design, the installation of equipment is not allowed. If permission for installation is not granted, it is best to ask for a written reasoned refusal.

Antenna types

Antenna is a special device that is used to amplify a television signal or receive a satellite signal. This equipment is installed on the facades or roofs of houses. Antennas work best when mounted as high as possible where no signal interference occurs. There are the following types of household signal amplifiers:

Important! To improve the digital or satellite signal, it is important to correctly determine the optimal place for installing the antenna, as well as orient it to the cardinal points. The difficulty in installing this type of equipment lies in the fact that the installation location and the height of the mast are most often determined empirically.

Installation difficulties

Setting up and installing an antenna with your own hands is a rather complicated process, which is best done together. It is produced in dry, calm weather, when it is more or less safe to move on the roof. However, during the installation process, the masters may encounter the following difficulties:

• High-altitude work. The installation of any equipment on the roof is essentially a work at height, so the fitter must have access to them, that is, undergo appropriate training. In the process of working at height, it is imperative to use insurance, as well as comply with safety requirements.
• Violation of the tightness of the roof. Any fastening hole in the roof surface is a hole in the roofing material, which leads to a deterioration in its waterproofing properties. Therefore, it is important to determine the optimal number of fixing points in order to securely fix the equipment, but to avoid leaks.
• Wind load. It is well known that the wind blows stronger on the roof, and the antennas, due to their high heights, have a high wind capacity, therefore they are affected by a strong wind load.
• Difficulty choosing a place for installation. It can be difficult for an inexperienced craftsman to independently determine the place where the antenna needs to be installed in order to improve signal reception.

Please note that in most cases, it is better to entrust the installation and configuration of roof-mounted equipment to professional craftsmen. Otherwise, you will have to perform the task together: one person will move the antenna along the roof, determining the optimal place, and the second will monitor the quality of signal reception from the TV.

Installation on flat roofs

Most of the roofs of apartment buildings have a flat roof type. On the one hand, it is more convenient for equipment installation than pitched one, since it is easy to move along it. However, the difficulty of working on flat roofs lies elsewhere - it is quite difficult to fix the antenna on its surface so that it does not violate the waterproofing. There are 2 installation methods for this type of roof:

Important! When choosing a method for installing equipment that amplifies the signal on a flat roof surface, one should be guided primarily by the issue of maintaining the integrity of the roofing pie. After all, minor damage or a fixing hole can destroy the roofing cake and cause leakage.

Installation on pitched roofs

It is more difficult to install any equipment on pitched roofs, since it is difficult to move on them without insurance. In addition, the mounting holes in it pose an even greater threat in terms of holes, therefore, the installation must be treated very carefully. There are two ways to install antennas on a pitched roof:

Important! If the roofing has a relief, then it is imperative to fix the television antenna on the crest of the wave, otherwise water will flow into the mounting holes, leading to leaks and corrosion of the roofing.

Video instruction

There are several types of antenna installations. Let's consider them in detail:

The satellite dishes are made of durable steel and can easily withstand bad weather conditions. Meet:

The latter, in terms of their quality, cause negative comments, showing "capriciousness" to external factors and having a short-term use. Mesh meshes are easy to transport and their installation is not difficult.

Formal nuances when installing an antenna on the roof

Before equipping a broadcast satellite, it is worth observing some formalities:

1. It is important to familiarize yourself with the nuances of Russian legislation in order to eliminate future misunderstandings with the housing office. The Housing Code stipulates the right of every tenant to partial ownership of the residential building, including the right to use the roof. Based on the legislation, the tenant has every right to use the attic, basement, roof as he wishes.
2. The roof entrance is often blocked. An ordinary tenant who is not a homeowner does not have access to the roof. He needs to take the key. According to the rules, only ZhEK employees have the right to be on the roof. In case of emergency, residents can also use the roof for their needs. The Russian Constitution is on the side of the residents and regulates the operation of the roof. The law will become the main argument in a dispute with workers in the housing and communal services.

Safety first of all when arranging the antenna

To avoid damage to the roof, attic and various communications, the following principles should be adhered to:

Roof antenna: where to install it?

The receiving device of the antenna better perceives communication signals in the absence of large buildings or massive trees nearby. It is better to install the structure at the highest point of the roof. The antenna mast is mounted on the slope of the house, located on the outside of the street. With a flat roof, the antenna is placed on the edge of the roof.

When placing a large number of antennas, it is worth observing a checkerboard order.

Principles of Correct Installation

First you need to prepare the tools:

• Electric drill;
• Screwdriver with different attachments;
• Drilling tool;
• Hammer;
• Keys;
• TV to check the received TV signal.

After determining the location of the antenna, you can begin to attach the satellite mast. The frame looks like an iron corner. It is fixed with brackets, bolts, brackets.
At the beginning, holes are made for fasteners. Anchor bolts (0.1 cm diameter) are inserted into the holes.
Stretch braces will provide strong fixation of the antenna. They will save the satellite dish from the wind load. To do this, use strong cables and attach them to the mast.
It is worth taking into account the material of the roof. On a tile roof, the antenna is installed on a ridge board or pediment. With a slate roof, the arrangement is carried out on a slope, a soft roof - on the pediment sides. A plank roof can support mounting the antenna directly to its structure.

After attaching the antenna, the process of final connection to the network takes place. The receiving heads of the satellite are connected to a cable that runs into the room of the apartment. The cable is inserted into the socket of the receiving device. It is important to secure the cable by insulating it 1 centimeter. The wire is secured with staples and small nails.

It is important to note: when installing an antenna, great importance is attached to a lightning rod. Metal structures are grounded. This action will protect the roof from damage, and people in the room from injury.

Let's define, you are the owner of a house on the roof, which you are going to install the antenna?

If you are a homeowner, then your rights are listed in red and white in the Civil Code and the Housing Code!

We quote the Civil Code:

Article 289. Apartment as an object of ownership

The owner of an apartment in an apartment building, along with the premises he owns, occupied as an apartment, also owns a share in the ownership of the common property of the house (Article 290).

Article 290. Common property of apartment owners in an apartment building

1. The owners of apartments in an apartment building own, on the basis of common share ownership, the common premises of the house, the supporting structures of the house, mechanical, electrical, sanitary-technical and other equipment outside or inside the apartment, serving more than one apartment.

And the Housing Code:

Article 36. Ownership of the common property of owners of premises in an apartment building

1. The owners of premises in an apartment building own, on the basis of common shared ownership, premises in this building that are not part of apartments and are intended to serve more than one premises in this building, including inter-apartment staircases, staircases, elevators, elevator and other shafts, corridors , technical floors, attics, basements, in which there are engineering communications, other equipment serving more than one room in this house (technical basements), as well as roofs enclosing the load-bearing and non-load-bearing structures of this house, mechanical, electrical, sanitary and other equipment located in this house outside or inside the premises and serving more than one premises, the land plot on which this house is located, with elements of landscaping and improvement and other objects intended for the maintenance, operation and improvement of this house, located on the specified land plot (hereinafter - common property in an apartment building). The boundaries and size of the land plot on which the apartment building is located are determined in accordance with the requirements of land legislation and legislation on urban planning.
2. The owners of premises in an apartment building own, use and, within the limits established by this Code and civil legislation, dispose of common property in an apartment building.
3. Reducing the size of the common property in an apartment building is possible only with the consent of all owners of premises in this building through its reconstruction.
4. By the decision of the owners of premises in an apartment building, adopted at a general meeting of such owners, common property in an apartment building may be transferred to other persons for use if this does not violate the rights and legitimate interests of citizens and legal entities.
5. The land plot on which the apartment building is located may be encumbered with the right of limited use by other persons. It is not allowed to prohibit the establishment of encumbrances on a land plot if it is necessary to provide access for other persons to objects that existed before the date of entry into force of this Code. A new encumbrance of a land plot with the right of limited use is established by agreement between the person requiring such encumbrance of the land plot and the owners of premises in an apartment building. Disputes on establishing the encumbrance of a land plot with the right of limited use or on the conditions of such encumbrance shall be resolved in court.

From all this, we conclude that you, as the owner of housing on the basis of shared ownership, along with other owners of an apartment building, belong to basements, walls, attics, roofs. In fact, you do not own any specific part of the roof, for example, located above your apartment, but the part of the roof, which is proportional to the area of ​​your property.

TO BE CONTINUED...

Today, many are not satisfied with cable television, which, in fact, imposes a certain set of channels. If you want more or others - pay.

As a result, it turns out that it is cheaper to install your own satellite dish for your TV than to feed cable TV operators for many years.

If you have your own house or cottage, there will be no problems, but in an apartment building this sometimes turns into an insoluble problem.

There are rules and regulations that must be followed in order to comfortably watch your favorite TV shows.

What are these rules? How and with whom to solve the issue of installing a satellite dish on the roof of an apartment building? Let's figure it out.

Dear Readers! Our articles tell about typical ways of solving legal issues, but each case is unique.

If you want to know how to solve your particular problem, please contact the online consultant form on the right or call the phones below. It's fast and free!

Rules for the use of common property in an apartment building

To begin with, you are the owner. The owner of your apartment and part of the common home property in a proportion proportional to the area of ​​your apartment.

This norm is established by the Civil and Housing Code of the Russian Federation (Articles 289 and 290 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Articles 36 and 37 of the LC RF).

This does not mean that you own part of the roof just above your apartment. It can be any free space on it.

So, going on a hike for the keys to the attic and the roof, arm yourself with the knowledge of the articles of the codes and remember - you are the owner, not the housing office, urban architecture or the municipality.

And you are about to exercise your legal right.

Where do I need to get permission to install the antenna?

To install a satellite dish, you do not need permission, but agreement.

Everything is already permitted for you by law, as an owner. But you will have to agree on some of the nuances.

And here it all depends on how and by whom your apartment building is managed - HOA, ZhEK or UK.

The easiest way to solve this is in the HOA, the issue is brought up to the general meeting, a protocol is drawn up, and you get the coveted keys without hindrance.

But the violation of the rights of other owners is another matter (Article 304 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation). When exercising your ownership, your actions must not harm other owners.

Antenna installation is the installation of equipment, which may be associated with a violation of the integrity of the roof (for example, holes for fasteners or for cables). Any holes in the roof are a threat of leakage, which means the possibility of harm to the occupants of the upper floor.

Therefore, in order to avoid further claims, it is better for you to obtain the written consent of your neighbors to install the equipment.

Most likely, you will not install the antenna yourself on the roof of your nine-story building, but invite specialists from the relevant organization. They know exactly what can and cannot be done when installing it.

Algorithm of actions

Having received the written consent of the neighbors, you must go to the management company or the housing office with a statement, which will indicate for what purpose you need the keys to the roof.

This is normal, because these organizations are responsible for order in the common house territory, for this, in fact, we, the owners of the house, hire them under a contract.

Another requirement that may await you in this organization is the provision of a technical design for the installation of equipment. Well, this requirement is also justified.

The antenna must be installed in compliance with all technical standards and requirements.

Therefore, in order not to encounter a denial of access to the roof of an apartment building, complete such a project in the organization that will install your antenna.

You will have to pay for this, but, most likely, it will cost you less blood than disputes with the management company. The project will have to be signed by her chief engineer.

In principle, this should be enough for you to open the entrance to the roof, especially if specialists are installing the antenna.

A copy of the contract between you and the antenna installers can be provided to the management company.

You do not need to coordinate your actions either with the city or district administration, or with the organization responsible for the appearance of residential buildings, because the antenna will be on the roof, and not on the facade of the building.

On the other hand, employees of the service organization can refer to the Resolution of the State Construction Committee "On the approval of the rules and regulations for the technical operation of the housing stock", in particular to Article 5.6.23, which prohibits residents from installing any radio broadcasting equipment on the roof without the permission of the operating organization.

What about this document? It's very simple. It is not a federal law or even a bylaw. This decree of an organization, even a state one, does not have the force of law, and therefore cannot serve as a basis for applying any sanctions to a citizen, that is, to you.

Employees of the management company may not obstruct you by referring to this document. It is only advisory in nature!

You are guided by the Constitution, codes and federal laws, about which you must inform the comrades responsible for keeping the keys and issuing them to the owners.

If you can't access the roof? Sadly, but it also happens, although usually the employees of the management company are enough of your legal knowledge and they give up.

If you were refused to issue keys, write an application addressed to the head of the management company in two copies. You will give one to the receptionist of the chief, the other, with a note on the acceptance of the application from you, you leave to yourself. And you are waiting for the result. If it is not followed, feel free to go to court, the truth is on your side.

What rules must be observed when installing an antenna in order not to disrupt the external architectural appearance of the existing buildings in the city? We invite you to watch the video.

One of the options for installing modern systems of autonomous power supply is the possibility of installing a generator on flat roofs of buildings and structures. This option is used in case of a shortage of free space and the impossibility of allocating a specially prepared indoor space. However, in this case, we are not talking about the installation of the power plant in an open design. For installation on flat roofs, it is necessary to reliably protect the generator from adverse weather conditions, as well as to provide sufficient noise insulation, for which a container version of the generator or the installation of power generating equipment in a special casing is used.

The main advantages of placing the power plant on the roof:

• saving space;
• all issues related to air supply are easily and cheaply resolved by eliminating the need to build an expensive air duct system;
• no need for a long exhaust system;
• with sufficient sound insulation, there is no problem of acoustic impact on people nearby.

The main disadvantages of placing a power plant on the roof:

• the roof structure must be able to support the weight of the equipment to be installed and the fuel tank;
• difficulties with raising the power plant to the required height;
• it is necessary to obtain the approval of the relevant services;
• the impossibility of installing a large number of fuel storage tanks;
• the length of the electrical cables increases.

Separate requirements in this version of the location of the power plant are imposed on the roof structure. In particular, floors must be carefully examined and designed to support the weight of the installed power generating equipment and the main fuel tank. In the event that the existing floors do not show sufficient strength, the generator set may be installed on platforms made of structural steel with their obligatory support on the load-bearing walls of the building.

Ways to reduce vibration load on a building
To reduce vibration from an operating unit, several methods have been developed and are actively used:

• For power plants with a capacity of up to 1 MW, it is often sufficient to use built-in vibration protection devices that reduce its level by 75-80%, as well as use additional solutions, such as installing additional vibration isolators between the base (chassis) of the power plant and the roof, which will reduce vibration to 98% of the entry level;
• for power plants with a capacity of more than 1 MW, built-in vibration damping devices may not be enough. In this case, the generator is installed on a specially prepared concrete base, which, in turn, is resiliently attached to the roof, which significantly reduces the level of vibration impact from the operation of powerful energy generating equipment.

It is worth noting that these methods of reducing vibration noise are actively used, including in our country, showing very good indicators of protection of buildings and structures from emerging vibration loads.

Ways to reduce the noise level
In addition to protecting the structure of buildings and structures from vibration caused by an operating generator set, of considerable importance when placing a power plant on the roof is the problem of reducing the noise level to regulated limits. As a primary measure for noise reduction, special containers or soundproof enclosures are used, into which the generator set itself is mounted. These solutions make it possible to reduce the noise level by 20-30 dB (A) compared to an open power plant.

In general, the noise standards for a running generator set, designed for placing equipment near places where people are permanently located or working, are as follows: the noise level of a running generator is considered acceptable within the range of 75 dB (A) at a distance of 1 m from the power plant.

Delivery of equipment to the installation site
One of the main challenges faced by rooftop power plants is the delivery of equipment to high altitudes. In particular, heavy-duty cranes impose certain restrictions. So a crane with a lifting capacity of 100 tons with a radius of a boom of 30 m is capable of lifting a load whose weight does not exceed 5 tons. The main problem here is not vertical lifting, but the movement of the weight horizontally, since in this case a large load is transferred to the crane boom. For example, to lift a 1.3 MW power plant, weighing 22 tons, on the roof of the eighth floor and install it at a distance of 14 m from the edge, a crane with a lifting capacity of 250 tons is required.

One of the options for solving the problem of cargo delivery by a crane and (or) insufficient free space on the ground for installing a crane is disassembling the power plant into separate parts (engine, generator, frame, etc.), delivering them separately and final assembly already on site installation. In general, this option, of course, takes more time, but in this case, a crane with a lower lifting capacity will be required, and the total cost of installation work will increase slightly.

The third delivery option is the possibility of using a helicopter. Here it is necessary to take into account a large number of existing restrictions, but if they can be overcome, this option is the most cost-effective and time-efficient.

Approvals required for a rooftop power plant
Considering that placing a diesel generator on the roof often leads to a certain change in the appearance of a building, this installation option must be approved by the relevant services and local authorities.

In one case, the municipal authorities consider it impossible to change the appearance of the building, in the other they only impose restrictions on the color of the container or casing. Therefore, in order to avoid problems in the future, it is advisable to coordinate all these issues with the local authorities in advance. In this case, depending on the terms of the contract, obtaining the appropriate permits "falls on the shoulders" of the owner of the generator or the agency involved in its installation.

Fuel supply issues
In accordance with existing standards, a limited amount of fuel can be permanently (stored) on the roof of a building, which is due not only to the weight of the fuel, but also to fire safety requirements. As a rule, the volume of stored fuel is limited to 450 liters in one tank, however, in any case, it is necessary to obtain the approval of the relevant authorities for the entire fuel system.

The larger fuel tank should be at ground level and positioned in accordance with fire safety requirements. From the main tank, fuel can be pumped into a supply tank located on the roof. In this case, the supply tank must be equipped with a float fuel level regulator to control the operation of the pump. The supply tank must be properly sized to prevent overfilling. The diameter of the "return" must not be less than the diameter of the main fuel supply pipe.

Issues of equipment for air ducts and exhaust systems
Rooftop placement of the power plant has one of the advantages of being able to save on ductwork and exhaust fumes. However, there are certain limitations here as well. In particular, if the roof is located below the level of neighboring buildings, the exhaust system must be designed with the prevailing winds in mind. In some cases, if there are office premises with open windows nearby, in some cases it is recommended to use a vertical chimney with a weather protection hood.

The air duct outlets must not contain any objects restricting the free flow of air. In addition, the outlet of the air ducts should be directed in the opposite direction from the direction of the prevailing winds. Otherwise, problems with the release of air or exhaust gases may arise within the system. To resolve this issue, it is recommended to install corner ventilation grilles on the outlets.

Laying electrical cables
When locating the power plant on the roof of a building, it must be borne in mind that the total length of the electrical cables can increase significantly. According to the recommendations, control cabinets for power generating equipment are installed as close as possible to the input of a common power source, from which networks are wired throughout the building, which significantly reduces the length of its own power supply cables.

The control cables are typically placed up to roof level and the power plant control system and associated sensors are generally located in the immediate vicinity of the generating set.

SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

DEFINITION
dated 25.12.2012 No. 69-KG12-6

The Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, composed of:
presiding Gorshkov V.V.,
judges Getman E.S., Momotova V.V.

examined in open court the case at the suit of S.L. Voropaev. to the open joint-stock company “Yugratel” (JSC “Yugratel”) on elimination of violations of the law not related to the deprivation of possession, on the cassation appeal of S.L. Voropaev. on the appeal ruling of the judicial collegium for civil cases of the court of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra dated April 10, 2012 No.

After hearing the report of the judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation V.V. Gorshkov, after hearing the representative of OJSC “Yugratel” A.S. Fomin, who objected to the satisfaction of the complaint, the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation established:

Voropaev S.L. applied to the court with the said claim, indicating that the owner of the non-residential premises No. ... of the house No. ... of the microdistrict of ... communication. At the same time, in violation of the law, the consent of the owners of the apartments in the residential building was not obtained; On February 11, 2011, at the extraordinary general meeting of the owners of the premises of the residential building, a majority of votes passed a decision against the transfer of the roof of the building for the use of OJSC “Yugratel”. Believing that the defendant violated his right, as the owner of apartment No. ... in the same house, to dispose of shares in common ownership of common property, he asked to impose the obligation on OJSC “Yugratel” to carry out the demolition (complete disassembly) of the antennas of the transmitting communication equipment, antenna-mast device with guy wires, metal structures located on the roof of entrance No. ... and the machine room of the elevator of house No. ...

By the decision of the Nyagan City Court of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug dated December 19, 2011, the claims of S.L. Voropaev. satisfied, OJSC "Yugratel" is obliged to carry out the demolition of the antennas of the receiving and transmitting communication equipment, the antenna-mast device with guy wires, the metal structures located on the roof of the entrance No. ... and the machine room of the elevator of house No. ... in ... . ...

By the appellate ruling of the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Ugra Court dated April 10, 2012, the decision of the Nyagan City Court dated December 19, 2011 was canceled. A new decision was made to refuse to satisfy the claims.

By the ruling of the Nyagan City Court of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra dated June 15, 2012, upheld by the appeal ruling of the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra Court dated August 7, 2012, from S.L. Voropaeva. in favor of OJSC “Yugratel” court expenses were recovered for payment of travel and state fees in the amount of ... RUB.

In the appeal Voropaev S.L. the question of transferring her with the case for consideration in the court session of the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation was raised.

By the decision of the judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation Gorshkov The.The. dated October 31, 2012, the cassation appeal with the case was forwarded for consideration at the hearing of the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

After checking the case materials, discussing the arguments set out in the complaint, objections to the cassation appeal, the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation finds that there are grounds provided for in Art. 387 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, for the cancellation of the held court decisions in cassation.

In accordance with Art. 387 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, grounds for canceling or changing court decisions in cassation are significant violations of substantive law or rules of procedural law that influenced the outcome of the case and without which the restoration and protection of violated rights, freedoms and legitimate interests, as well as protection of protected the law of public interest.

In resolving the dispute and deciding whether to satisfy the stated requirements, the court of first instance proceeded from the fact that by virtue of the provisions of paragraph 1 of Art. 246 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Part 2 of Art. 36 ZhK of the Russian Federation, the defendant, prior to installation on the roof of an apartment building No. ... at the address: g. ...- microdistrict, of the antenna-mast structure, was obliged to obtain the consent of the owners of the premises, including the plaintiff. After examining the evidence presented by the parties according to the rules of Art. 67 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, the court concluded that such consent was not received by the defendant, which is confirmed, among other things, by the minutes of the meeting of owners of premises in an apartment building dated February 11, 2011, which the defendant did not appeal against in accordance with the established procedure.

Also, the court of first instance took into account that the permit for the construction of the disputed object No. 141 of October 17, 2005, approved by the deputy mayor of Nyagan M., had a permitting nature, subject to the consent of the owners of the apartment building, as well as the provision of positive conclusions from the state supervision authorities. However, on July 3, 2003, the Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Supervision of the city of Nyagan did not give a conclusion on the compliance of the SanPiN with the placement of a satellite receiving-transmitting station in apartment No. ... of house No. sanitary zones of sanitary protection to the kindergarten and maternity ward, located on the border of the territory of the named house, and during the consideration of the case by the defendant, such an agreement was not presented.

Since during the construction of the KSKPT equipment as part of the Yugra-PM satellite receiving and transmitting station and telecommunications equipment, the rights of third parties - owners of premises in an apartment building, including the plaintiff, were not respected, the court concluded that it was necessary to oblige the defendant to demolish the structure.

Canceling the decision of the court of first instance and adopting a new decision to refuse to satisfy the stated requirements, the judicial board for civil cases of the court of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra indicated that both the plaintiff and the defendant have equal rights to own, use and dispose of the roof of the house personally and together with other owners of the premises of this house, the resolution of disputes between co-owners of common property in an apartment building about the use of common property does not fall within the competence of the general meeting, the plaintiff has chosen an inappropriate way to protect his rights. Also, the court of appeal indicated that the court did not apply Art. 247 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, which establishes the procedure for resolving disputes between owners of property in shared ownership.

Meanwhile, the Judicial Collegium finds that the appellate ruling of the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra Court of April 10, 2012 was adopted in violation of the norms of substantive and procedural law and cannot be agreed with it on the following grounds.

In accordance with the provisions of Art. 196 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, the court makes a decision on the claims stated by the plaintiff.

By virtue of Art. 304 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the owner can demand the elimination of any violations of his rights, even if these violations were not connected with the deprivation of ownership.

A claim for the elimination of violations of the right not related to deprivation of possession shall be satisfied if the plaintiff proves that he is the owner or a person who owns the property on the grounds provided for by law or contract, and that the actions of the defendant not related to the deprivation of possession are violated his ownership or legal possession. This legal position is set out in the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 10, Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation No. 22 dated April 29, 2010 “On some issues arising in judicial practice when resolving disputes related to the protection of property rights and other property rights ".

Voropaev S.L. is the owner of a dwelling in an apartment building No. ... th microdistrict g. ... and by virtue of Art. 36 ZhK of the Russian Federation, on the basis of common share ownership, belongs to the common property in an apartment building, used by the defendant for his own needs.

Since Voropaev S.L. believed that the construction of an antenna-mast structure on the roof of the house violated his rights as a co-owner of the common property, one cannot agree with the conclusion of the court of appeal that the plaintiff had chosen an inappropriate way to protect his rights.

What method of protecting the rights of S.L. Voropaev, in the opinion of the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Ugra court, is appropriate, was not indicated in the appealed court decision.

As indicated in paragraph 1 of Art. 247 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the possession and use of property in shared ownership is carried out by agreement of all its participants, and if no agreement is reached, in the manner established by the court.

During the consideration of the case, it was established that during the construction of the antenna-mast structure on the roof of the house of OJSC "Yugratel" no agreement was reached with all the participants in the shared ownership of the common property of the apartment building; this issue had not been previously resolved in court either.

Thus, although the defendant has equal rights with other owners to own, use and dispose of the roof of the house, however, the implementation of this right is due to the need to reach an agreement between all participants in shared ownership. This circumstance was not taken into account by the court of appeal.

One cannot agree with the defendant's argument that, in view of his ownership of a significant share in the common shared property, he could use the common property of an apartment building at his own discretion, since the law established a special procedure for the owners to exercise the right to use the common property of an apartment building, which does not depend on the size of the share belonging to the owner.

In addition, referring to the fact that the court of first instance did not apply the provisions of Art. 247 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the judicial collegium for civil cases of the court of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra, when making a new decision, also did not apply this rule of law.

The defendant in the objections indicates that the antenna-mast structure on the roof of a residential building is not an object of urban planning and does not have its features, and therefore, when resolving the issue of the legality of installing this device, the norms of the town planning code are not applicable. Meanwhile, the named circumstance does not exempt the defendant from the need to comply with the sanitary and epidemiological rules and regulations used in the construction of facilities of this type, contained, in particular, in the sanitary and epidemiological rules and regulations "Hygienic requirements for the placement and operation of transmitting radio technical facilities SanPiN 2.1. 8 / 2.2.4.1383-03, approved by the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation on June 9, 2003.

The above-mentioned circumstances of the judicial collegium for civil cases of the court of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Ugra were not evaluated when the new decision was made.

Violations of the norms of substantive and procedural law committed by the court of appeal are significant and insurmountable, and therefore can be corrected only by canceling the court order.

Taking into account the foregoing, the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation considers that the appeal ruling of the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra Court of April 10, 2012 cannot be recognized as legal, it must be canceled, and the case must be sent to a new consideration in the court of appeal.

Based on the foregoing and guided by Art. 387, 388, 390 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation determined:

the appellate ruling of the judicial collegium for civil cases of the court of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra dated April 10, 2012 to cancel, transfer the case for a new appeal consideration to the judicial collegium for civil cases of the court of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra.

Presiding
V.V. Gorshkov
Judges
Getman E.S.
Momotov V.V.

///
Explanations to the document:

1.

According to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the possession and use of property in shared ownership is carried out by agreement of all its participants.

If no agreement is reached, such a procedure is established by the court.

According to the RF Housing Code, the share in common ownership of common property in an apartment building is proportional to the size of the area of ​​the premises owned by the owner.

Based on these norms, each such owner has equal rights with other owners to own, use and dispose of such property (for example, the roof of a house).

At the same time, the implementation of this right is due to the need to reach an agreement between all participants in shared ownership.

Therefore, the conclusion that the owner, who owns a significant share in the common shared property, can use such property of an apartment building at his own discretion, is erroneous.

The law establishes a special procedure for the implementation by co-owners of the right to use the common property of an apartment building.

This procedure does not depend on the size of the share owned by the owner.

Source: Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

2.

V. applied to the court with a claim against the joint-stock company to eliminate violations of the law not related to deprivation of ownership, indicating that the owner of non-residential premises in an apartment building (society) for commercial purposes on the roof of this residential building installed telecommunication equipment for antenna mast devices of the station communication. At the same time, in violation of the law, the consent of the owners of the apartments in the residential building was not obtained; at an extraordinary general meeting of the owners of the premises of a residential building, a decision was made by a majority of votes against the transfer of the roof of the building for the use of society. Believing that the defendant had violated his right as the owner of an apartment in the same house to dispose of shares in common ownership of common property, V. asked him to be obliged to demolish (completely disassemble) the antennas of the transmitting and receiving communication equipment, the antenna mast device with guy wires , metal structures, located on the roof of the entrance and the machine room of the elevator of the house.

V.'s claims were satisfied by the decision of the court of first instance.

By an appellate ruling, the said decision was canceled. A new decision was made to refuse to satisfy the claims.

The Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, on V.'s cassation appeal, canceled the appeal ruling in the case, sending the case for a new appeal hearing on the following grounds.

In resolving the dispute and deciding whether to satisfy the stated requirements, the court of first instance proceeded from the fact that by virtue of the provisions of paragraph 1 of Art. 246 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and clause 2 of Art. 36 of the RF LCD, the defendant, before installing the antenna-mast structure on the roof of an apartment building, was obliged to obtain the consent of the owners of the premises, including the plaintiff. After examining the evidence presented by the parties in accordance with the rules of "Article 67" of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, the court concluded that such consent was not obtained by the defendant, which is confirmed, among other things, by the minutes of the meeting of owners of premises in an apartment building, which the defendant did not appeal against in accordance with the established procedure.

The court of first instance also took into account that the permit for the construction of the disputed object, approved by local authorities, had a permissive nature, subject to the consent of the owners of the apartment building, as well as the provision of positive conclusions from the state supervision authorities. However, the authorities of the State Sanitary and Epidemiological Supervision did not give an opinion on the compliance of the SanPiN with the placement of the satellite receiving and transmitting station in the premises belonging to the defendant, since after the development of the project of this station, it was required to agree on the placement of sanitary zones of sanitary protection to the kindergarten and maternity ward located on the border of the territory of the named house, and when considering In the case of the defendant, no such agreement was presented.

Since during the construction of the KSCPT equipment as part of a satellite receiving and transmitting station and telecommunications equipment, the rights of third parties - owners of premises in an apartment building, including the plaintiff, were not respected, the court concluded that it was necessary to oblige the defendant to demolish the structure.

Canceling the decision of the court of first instance and making a new decision to refuse to satisfy the stated requirements, the court of appeal indicated that both the plaintiff and the defendant have equal rights to own, use and dispose of the roof of the house personally and jointly with other owners of the premises of this house, dispute resolution between co-owners of common property in an apartment building on the use of common property does not fall within the competence of the general meeting, the plaintiff has chosen an inappropriate way to protect his rights. The court of second instance also indicated that the court did not apply Art. 247 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, which establishes the procedure for resolving disputes between owners of property in shared ownership.

Meanwhile, in accordance with the provisions of Art. 196 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, the court makes a decision on the claims stated by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff chose a way to protect his rights by going to court with a claim to eliminate violations of property rights not related to deprivation of ownership.

By virtue of Art. 304 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the owner can demand the elimination of any violations of his rights, even if these violations were not connected with the deprivation of ownership.

A claim for the elimination of violations of the right not related to deprivation of possession shall be satisfied if the plaintiff proves that he is the owner or a person who owns the property on the grounds provided for by law or contract, and that the actions of the defendant not related to the deprivation of possession are violated his ownership or legal possession. This legal position is set out in the Resolution of April 29, 2010 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation N 10, Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation N 22 "On some issues arising in judicial practice when resolving disputes related to the protection of property rights and other property rights ".

V. is the owner of a dwelling in an apartment building, and by virtue of Art. 36 of the Housing Code of the Russian Federation, by the right of common share ownership, belongs to the common property in an apartment building, used by the defendant for his own needs.

Since V. believed that the erection of an antenna-mast structure on the roof of the house violated his rights as a co-owner of the common property, the conclusion of the court of appeal that the plaintiff had chosen an inappropriate way to protect his rights is incorrect.

What method of protecting V.'s rights, in the opinion of the court of appeal, is appropriate, was not indicated in the contested court decision.

According to paragraph 1 of Art. 247 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the possession and use of property in shared ownership is carried out by agreement of all its participants, and if no agreement is reached, in the manner established by the court.

During the consideration of the case, it was established that during the construction of the antenna-mast structure on the roof of the house, the defendant did not reach an agreement with all the participants in the shared ownership of the common property of the apartment building, and this issue had not been previously resolved in court either.

Thus, although the defendant had equal rights with other owners to own, use and dispose of the roof of the house, the implementation of this right is due to the need to reach an agreement between all participants in shared ownership. This circumstance was not taken into account by the court of appeal.

The defendant's argument that, due to his significant share in the common shared property, he could use the common property of the apartment building at his own discretion, is also untenable, since the law establishes a special procedure for co-owners to exercise the right to use the common property of an apartment building, which does not depend on the size of the property belonging to the owner. share.

In addition, referring to the fact that the court of first instance did not apply the provisions of Art. 247 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the higher court, when making a new decision, also did not apply this "norm" of law.

When considering claims for the elimination of violations of law not related to deprivation of ownership by the defendant erecting a building, structure, structure, the court establishes the fact of compliance with town planning and building codes and regulations during the construction of the relevant facility.

Failure to comply, including insignificant, urban planning and building codes and regulations during construction may be the basis for satisfying the claimed claim, if this violates the ownership or legal possession of the plaintiff.

The defendant pointed out in objections that the antenna-mast structure on the roof of a residential building was not an object of urban planning and did not have its signs, and therefore, when resolving the issue of the legality of the installation of this device, the norms of the Town Planning "Code" were not subject to application. Meanwhile, the above circumstance did not exempt the defendant from the need to comply with the sanitary and epidemiological rules and standards used in the construction of facilities of this type, contained, in particular, in the Sanitary and Epidemiological “rules” and standards “Hygienic Requirements for the Placement and Operation of Transmitting Radio Engineering Objects.” SanPiN 2.1.8 / 2.2.4.1383-03 ", approved by the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation on June 9, 2003.

Thus, the actions of the defendant to place an antenna-mast structure on the roof of an apartment building without observing the above legislative requirements, as well as its continued operation, violated the rights of the plaintiff as a co-owner of the common property of an apartment building in shared ownership, which was ignored by the court of appeal ...

The court of appeal did not assess the above circumstances when making a new decision.

The company "InformTelecom" offers its services for the placement of equipment (colocation) in the data processing center (DC) for its connection to data networks or through dedicated communication channels

A data center, or as it is also called - Data Center, is a special room for hosting server equipment (colocation). With the help of such centers for storing and processing information, subscribers have the opportunity to receive communication services.

As a rule, data centers are focused on the interests of corporate clients, allowing them to solve business problems in the provision of information services. As the location of data centers, they usually choose a room near the communication center and the place of presence of telecom operators.

The quality of the services provided depends on the bandwidth of the channels, therefore the main criterion for assessing the performance of the data center is the server availability time.

Option to install equipment in our data center

How it all began

The history of the emergence of data centers dates back to the dawn of the computer industry, when the equipment was too bulky and needed special rooms with special conditions for work. The equipment of that time needed a lot of wires to connect certain elements, so cable channels, raised floors and server racks began to be used in computer rooms.

Those systems were quite primitive, so they consumed a lot of electricity - they had to be constantly cooled to avoid overheating of the equipment. Safety also played an important role, since the equipment was quite expensive and was often used for the needs of the defense industry.

Over time, the IT industry began to develop rapidly. In the 90s of the last century, the client-server architecture was invented, and the hardware, which everyone now knows under the name of servers, began to be located in old server rooms.

Inexpensive networking equipment became more and more available, therefore, taking into account the possibility of using hierarchical design, servers began to be placed in separate rooms.

The peak of popularity of data centers came in the late 90s - early 2000s. Companies were looking for a way to make their equipment work smoothly in order to provide a high-speed and stable Internet connection. However, the competent and professional placement of telecommunications equipment was beyond the power of most companies. It was then that they began to build separate large rooms for computer systems and other equipment, etc.

Data centers today

Currently, the field of design and construction of data centers is well studied. Standards have been developed that set requirements for the design, construction and operation of data centers.

Unfortunately, building and operating data centers is costly. InformTelecom offers an excellent way out of the situation - renting a site for placing telecommunications equipment.

The uniqueness of our data center lies in the fact that it is located in the premises of the technical floor directly under the roof of a high-rise building. This gives an excellent opportunity not only to place and connect server equipment (colocation). to existing communication channels, but also to install their own transmitting antennas to organize new data transmission channels.

Communication equipment installation option

In addition, all the conditions necessary for the efficient operation of data centers have been created in the premises of the technical floor, which ensures their long and uninterrupted operation.

Battery installation option for uninterrupted equipment operation

We offer the best prices in this market segment - you can familiarize yourself with the price list for our services.

employees .

Placement of cellular equipment

Are you interested? Our employees will be happy to answer all your questions.

Base station placement

Base stations can be placed not only on special structures, the so-called masts. If used, you can save a significant amount on the construction of the mast, since this procedure includes a whole range of expensive activities - project development, paperwork, production of a support, construction of a foundation, assembly, installation of an antenna and related equipment, connection and launch.

In addition, very strict requirements are imposed on the location of such a high-rise mast, so it is not always possible to build it in the desired place.

Therefore, it is much more profitable and easier to develop a structure for placing a cellular base station on the roof of one of the high-rise buildings. For these purposes, InformTelecom offers the rooftop area of ​​a high-rise building located in the very center of Moscow, which guarantees a large coverage area.

Antenna installation options

Benefits when placing equipment on the roof

Many believe that one of the disadvantages of placing cell towers on the rooftops of high-rise buildings is the high density of buildings within the city, which can reduce the effectiveness and range of the signal. This fact takes place only if the house is not high enough and it will be obstructed by trees and neighboring buildings. The house that our company offers is one of the highest in the capital, which provides excellent signal quality.

Another disadvantage of using high-rise roofs is that such areas are not always convenient and suitable for equipment installation. Our platform is specially designed for placing antennas and base stations: the roof is flat and very strong, which allows placing heavy, large-sized devices on the roof. Server equipment can be installed on the technical floor of the building.

In addition, if you conclude an agreement with us for the placement of the base station, we can offer you the services of a professional team of installers who will install the base station properly and in compliance with all specific requirements.

One of the obvious advantages of the roof of our high-rise building is its good location. With your home in a central location, you are guaranteed excellent coverage and consistent signal strength.

Benefits of placing base stations in urban areas

Consider the differences in the location of cell towers in the city and beyond. When placing equipment outside the city, it is required to obtain special permits from the relevant authorities. Having placed your equipment on the roof of the house from the InformTelecom company, you can not worry about such a problem. In addition, it is often very difficult to find the ideal location to build a base station mast and therefore ensure a decent signal level.

Leading mobile operators have already managed to use the services of InformTelecom and, accordingly, the territory of the roof of our house. The time has come to use the experience of foreign companies and invest in the development of your business, and not in the construction of expensive structures - it is much easier to rent space for antennas and base stations through the InformTelecom company! We also offer lease of technical rooms where you can place server equipment. You can learn more about the rental options and the cost of our services.

Are you interested? Our employees will be happy to answer all your questions.

High-rise communication structures

The coverage area of ​​a cellular network is divided into so-called cells or cells. The cell size depends on the building density and can range from several tens of meters to 2-3 kilometers. Special antennas of the base station, which are panel or sector, are responsible for the signal and the range of the cell. Sometimes you can find omnidirectional antennas with a circular pattern of signal propagation in all directions from the base station.

The exterior of our high-rise building

Are you interested? Our employees will be happy to answer all your questions.

Roof rental

The first challenge that telecoms and cellular operators typically face is where to place antennas and other transmitting equipment. The signal quality directly depends on this factor.

In the case of cellular communications and mobile Internet, it is required to provide a line of sight between the base station (transmitting antenna) and the consumer. In the case of radio relay communication, it is necessary that there is a direct connection between the two antennas.

Therefore, a location for transmitting equipment should be chosen that will not be obstructed by trees, buildings, or other external factors.

The best option in this case is the roof of a high-rise building, but, unfortunately, not every organization has such a site at its disposal. InformTelecom offers a unique service - renting a place for installing antennas and other related equipment. You don't have to look for a specialized site - it already exists!

The exploited roof is ideal for placing antennas

Renting a site for installing antennas is a common practice abroad, where not every company can buy out such a large area for personal use. We suggest that you adopt the successful experience of foreign companies and do not waste your money - just rent a place for your equipment and enjoy an uninterrupted signal. And the company's clients, in turn, will enjoy the excellent quality of your service!

Advantages of renting a place on the roof from "InformTelecom"

Third, you will be fully protected legally. When concluding a contract, all the nuances are taken into account both on the part of the client and on the part of the contractor.

In addition, there are several other factors in favor of renting a rooftop space.

1. You will get round-the-clock access to your equipment, so you can quickly solve any problems (if any).
2. The roof of the building is under 24/7 surveillance. Security is provided by a dispatching and access control system: the dispatcher on duty immediately recognizes any incidents on the territory of the facility, who, if necessary, informs the client about it. This allows you to instantly take the necessary action and avoid trouble.
3. Installation of antennas and other equipment can be done by our specialists. The staff of our company includes a team of experienced professionals who have been installing specialized equipment for many years. Moreover, we can not only install the equipment, but also configure it properly.

Panoramic view

In Moscow, there is not a single place where you can easily place a cell tower to receive an uninterrupted high-quality signal, except for the roofs of high-rise buildings. Renting a space for installing antennas is an ideal solution for companies that do not have their own high-rise buildings. You can find out the rates for equipment placement.

Are you interested? Our employees will be happy to answer all your questions.