Comparison of the performance of mobile intel processors. ARM processor - mobile processor for smartphones and tablets

Let's see what are the main differences between the processors of the world leaders - Intel and AMD.

We will also consider their positive and negative sides.

Major CPU manufacturers

Everyone understands perfectly well that there are two leading companies in the computing market that are engaged in the development and production of the Central Processing Unit (central processing unit), or, more simply, processors.

These devices combine millions of transistors and other logic elements, and are electronic devices of the highest complexity.

The whole world uses computers, the heart of which is an electronic chip either from Intel or AMD, so it's no secret that both of these companies are constantly fighting for leadership in this area.

But let's leave these companies alone and move on to the average user who is faced with a dilemma of choice - which is still preferable - Intel or AMD?

Say what you like, but there is no definite answer to this question, and there cannot be, since both manufacturers have huge potential, and their CPUs are capable of meeting the current requirements.

When choosing a processor for a device, the user primarily focuses on its performance and cost - relying on these two criteria as the main ones.

Most of the users have long been divided into two opposing camps, becoming ardent supporters of Intel or AMD products.

Let's take a look at all the strengths and weaknesses of the devices of these leading companies, so that when choosing a particular one, we rely not on speculation, but on specific facts and characteristics.

Pros and cons of Intel processors

So what are the advantages of an Intel processor?

• First of all, it is very high performance and performance in applications and games, which are most optimized for Intel processors.
• Under the control of these processors, the system operates with maximum stability.
• It should be noted that the memory of the second and third levels in Intel CPUs operates at higher speeds than in similar processors from AMD.
• An important role in performance when working with optimized applications is played by multithreading, which is implemented by Intel in such CPUs as Core i7.

Pros and cons of AMD processors

• The advantages of AMD processors, first of all, are their affordability in terms of cost, which is remarkably combined with performance.
• A huge plus is the multi-platform, which allows you to replace one processor model with another without having to change the motherboard.
• That is, a processor designed for socket AM3 can be installed on socket AM2 + without any negative consequences.
• It should be noted and multitasking, with which many AMD processors do an excellent job, simultaneously performing work with three applications.
• In addition, the FX series processors have quite good overclocking potential, which is sometimes badly needed.

• The disadvantages of AMD's CPUs include higher power consumption than Intel's, as well as work at lower cache speeds of the second and third levels.
• It should also be noted that most of the processors belonging to the FX line require additional cooling, which will have to be purchased separately.
• And one more disadvantage is that fewer games and applications have been adapted and written for AMD processors than for Intel.

Latest connectors from Intel

Today, many of the leading CPU manufacturers are equipped with two current connectors. Intel has the following:

• LGA 2011 v3 is a combo connector that is focused on the online assembly of a high-performance personal computer for both servers and the end user. The key feature of such a platform is the presence of a RAM controller that successfully operates in multichannel mode. Thanks to this important feature, PCs with such processors offer unprecedented performance. It must be said that an integrated subsystem is not used within such a platform. Unlocking the potential of such chips is possible only with the help of discrete graphics. For this, only the best video cards should be used;
• Thanks to LGA, you can easily organize not only a high-performance computing system, but also a budget PC. For example, socket LGA 1151 perfect for creating a mid-priced computing station, while at the same time it will have a powerful integrated graphics core of the Intel Graphics series and support DDR4 memory.

Latest AMD connectors

AMD is promoting the following processor sockets today:

• the main computing platform for such a developer is considered AM3 +... The most productive CPUs are considered to be the FX lineup, which includes up to eight computational modules. In addition, such a platform supports an integrated graphics subsystem. However, this is where the graphics core goes into the motherboard rather than being integrated into semiconductor crystals;
• most recent current AMD CPU socket - FM3 +... AMD's new CPUs are aimed at both entry-level and mid-range desktops and media centers. Thanks to this, the most modern integrated solution will be available to the average user for a fairly small amount.

Work Opportunities

Many people pay attention to the price of the processor first. It is also important for them that he can easily solve the tasks assigned to him.

So what can both organizations offer on this point? AMD is not known for its outstanding achievements.

On the other hand, this processor represents an excellent price / performance ratio. If you set it up correctly, you can expect stable operation without any complaints.

It is worth noting that AMD has managed to implement multitasking. Thanks to such a processor, various applications are easily launched.

With it, you can simultaneously install the game and surf the endless expanses of the Internet.

But Intel is known for more modest results in this area, which confirms the comparison of processors.

It will not be superfluous to pay attention to the possibility of overclocking, during which the performance of the AMD processor can be easily increased by twenty percent over the standard settings.

To do this, you just need to use additional software.

Intel beats AMD in almost everything except multitasking. In addition, Intel has work with

So choosing a motherboard and power supply should be much more careful in order to prevent freezes with insufficient power.

Intel vs AMD Power Consumption Graph The same story with heat dissipation. It is high enough for older models. As a result, the standard cooler can hardly cope with the increased cooling.

Therefore, when buying a CPU from AMD, you must additionally purchase high-quality cooling from any decent company. Keep in mind that quality fans are much less noisy.

Socket type and performance

We should also say about performance. After AMD acquired ATI, its creators were able to successfully integrate most of the graphics processing capabilities into the processor cores. These efforts have paid off successfully.

Those who use an AMD chip for games should have no doubt that they get good performance, which is much better than those of equivalent Intel chips (this is especially true for those who use a card with ATI graphics).

If it comes to a lot of multitasking, then it is better to opt for Intel, since it has HyperTreasing technology.

However, this advantage can only be used when the software application is capable of multitasking, that is, the ability to divide tasks into several small parts.

If the user needs a gaming processor, it is better to combine an AMD processor with a video card.

So there is a big difference between intel and amd processor sockets. When choosing the appropriate option, consider the differences between them listed in this article. This will greatly simplify the selection of the appropriate option.

At the end of each year, we summarize the benchmark results for most modern processors, taking into account BIOS updates and changes in performance, and then divide the resulting data into three separate categories.

The first part of our ranking focuses on performance in gaming benchmarks, in the second we will touch on performance in CAD applications for workstations (real-time rendering), and finally in the third we will collect general data on performance, rendering and power consumption.

No one can always be a leader: a system that lacks performance today may surpass all others tomorrow. So if you have a good strategy, then you can be confident in your future.

This truth works, but not always. First of all, you need to understand today's PC capabilities, tomorrow's computing needs, and also have a reserve for the future. This is where you need to focus - and plan for a small supply.

Unfortunately, high productivity always costs more, perhaps even not always proportionally, so it is very important to determine the optimal volume of such a stock.

Our requests, desires and financial capabilities do not always coincide. However, in this case, there is the concept of "common sense", allowing you to drop insurmountable obstacles. It is always worth combining environmental aspects, such as energy consumption and durability, with economic - costs and profitability of the purchase. Simply put, it's worth buying exactly what you really need (or need in the near future).

Our testing methodology is described in the article ", so for convenience we will refer to this article. If you are interested in details, we recommend that you refer to it.

The differences from this method in relation to this testing are reduced to the hardware configuration: processor, RAM, motherboard and cooling system, the features of which can be found in the following table.

Let's start with two synthetic benchmarks, dividing them into two categories for DirectX11 and DirectX12 support. In the 3DMark Fire Strike benchmark, core count is most important, which boosts the performance of older multi-core processors that don't run at high enough clock speeds, such as the Core i7-6950X. AMD Threadripper and Ryzen 7 also demonstrate good results. Simple quad-core processors have little chance here, as well as Intel six-core processors without Hyper-Threading support.

The pattern is repeated in 3DMark Time Spy based on DirectX12. Regardless of the software interface, there is nothing to replace the number of cores. The performance becomes even more convincing with increasing clock speeds.

As in 3DMark, core count plays a major role in Ashes of Singularity: Escalation, followed by clock speed. This is a good example of proper load balancing across multiple threads.

In Civilization VI, the number of threads also matters, but in processors with eight or more possible threads (for example, in Intel Core i7-7700K using Hyper-Threading, clock speeds start to play an important role. So this game needs the right balance between number of cores and clock frequency.

In the game Warhammer 40K: Dawn of War III, the CPU clock speed comes to the fore, while four well-scalable threads will be enough. This lowers Ryzen slightly and boosts the performance of Intel chips.

Grand Theft Auto V is also an Intel-dominated construction site overall. At the same time, all Ryzen do not look too bad in terms of price-performance ratio.

In Hitman 2016, the AMD world looks pretty good. At the same time, the basic performance of the chips (for example, in the case of the Intel Core i5-8400) is limited by the power of the video card used. This is a clear example of the fact that if any of the components serve as limiting factors, any increase in performance can be costly. The key to everything is the right balance: the video card must match the processor level, and vice versa.

Project Cars is completely dominated by Intel processors. Even the junior quad-core models without Hyper-Threading are significantly ahead of Ryzen 7 and Threadripper. Ryzen 3 and Pentium fail completely, and Ryzen 7 1700 has problems with too low clock speeds. So overclocking is indispensable here.

Far Cry Primal is the second game in our tests where the graphics card is the limiting factor, but a little clarification is needed here. This game works well with eight threads, and physical cores are not necessary, a quad-core chip with Hyper-Threading will do if the clock speeds are high enough. However, with "purely" quad-core models, this trick will no longer work if their clock frequency does not go beyond certain limits. In other words, frequency is important here, but frequency alone is not enough.

In the VRMark test, we see a similar picture, and here Threadripper is already ahead of all Ryzen 7 modifications. However, this test is still the domain of Intel chips.

Bad news first: there is no single best processor we tested, so all factors need to be considered in order to make the right choice, such as the purpose of use, the performance you need, the overall concept of your PC, and your budget. So the good news is that everyone can find the best processor for themselves.

Games or office applications, workstation packages or HTPCs? The applications and applications are multifaceted, and most of us already know how a new processor will be used before purchasing it. The wrong choice not only causes disappointment in the acquisition, but also often leads to significant financial losses, especially if you have to resell, exchange or completely replace components that do not fit together.

There are many options for combining components. Does your CPU match the socket on the motherboard, and if so, does the motherboard itself support it? Is the cooling system suitable in terms of power for this processor, and if so, does this cooler cover the RAM modules and does it interfere with the installation of a video card in the first PCI Express slot? There are such "experts" who screw a huge cooler onto a mini-ITX board, and only then think about the case ...

Processor prices fluctuate like palm trees during a tropical cyclone, and any budding assembler pays attention to them first. Therefore, we are not going to comment on the price level in any way, since both the usual market price adjustments and the relative scarcity of individual models (for example, the Coffee Lake-S from Intel) make such comments meaningless just a few days after they were uttered. Therefore, we simply present the "clean" results and leave the readers the opportunity to inquire about prices on their own.

This article will compare the processor products of the two leading manufacturers of semiconductor chips: Intel vs AMD. Also, their current computing platforms will be considered, their strengths and weaknesses will be indicated. Well, in addition to this, possible configurations of computers will be given.

Main current processor sockets x86

Today, each of the leading manufacturers of central processing units has 2 actual processor sockets. At Intel it is:

Socket LGA 2011-v3. This combo processor socket is targeted at both high-performance personal computers assemblies for computer enthusiasts and servers. The key feature of this platform is the RAM controller, which can operate in 4-channel mode, and it is this important feature that provides processor products with unprecedented performance. It should also be noted that this platform does not use an integrated graphics subsystem. Only discrete graphics can unleash the potential of such high-performance chips, and it is precisely on the use of this class of computer components that the LGA 2011 - v3 processor socket is oriented.

Socket LGA 1151. This computing platform allows you to organize both budget-level PCs and high-performance computing systems. In this case, the RAM controller can function as much as possible in 2-channel mode. Also, almost every central processing unit in the LGA 1151 is equipped with an integrated video card, which will perfectly "fit" into an office or budget system unit. In terms of performance, this socket loses to the previously reviewed LGA 2011-v3, but outperforms any AMD solution. Therefore, if we compare Intel i5 vs AMD Fx-8XXX, the advantage, both in performance and in energy efficiency, will be with the products of the first company.

In turn, AMD is actively promoting the following processor sockets today:

The main computing platform for this developer of microprocessor devices is AM3 +. The most productive CPUs within its framework are FX chips, which can include from 4 to 8 computational modules. The RAM controller in AM3 +, like in LGA 1151, can function as much as possible in. Only in this case we are talking about support for the outdated RAM standard - DDR3, but LGA 1151 boasts support for the latest and fastest DDR4. Therefore, if we compare the most recent Intel i5 vs AMD Fx-9XXX, then even the flagship solutions of the latter will lose significantly in performance. Also within this platform there is support for the integrated graphics subsystem. But, unlike the sameLGA 1151,the integrated graphics core in this case leads to the composition of the motherboard, and is not integrated into the semiconductor crystal of the CPU.

The most recent AMD processor socket today isFM2+. Its main niche is inexpensive multimedia stations, office or ultra-budget computers. main featureFM2 + -it is a very productive integrated subsystem that can compete on an equal footing with discrete entry-level video cards in performance and is significantly ahead of Intel's products of this class. But the limiting factor on the way to the success of this socket is the weak processor part of this semiconductor solution. Therefore, the use of this connector in the context of even an entry-level completely and completelyunjustifiably.

LGA 1151. Main characteristics

This computing platform currently occupies a dominant position in the desktop computer market, and it is this platform that provides a significant advantage in comparison with Intel vs AMD on the side of the former. Moreover, both in quantitative and qualitative terms. As noted earlier, it boasts the following advantages over its direct competitors in the face of AM3 + and FM2 +: an integrated DDR4 RAM controller, the mandatory presence of a graphics subsystem and a cache memory that includes three levels without fail. The positioning of chips within LGA 1151, as well as their most important parameters, are shown in Table 1. If we make a direct comparison between Intel Core i5 vs AMD FX-9 XXX series, then in the overwhelming majority of tasks the advantage will be with the first solution. There is nothing special about this: the latest generation of Intel chips was presented in the summer of 2015, and AMD - in 2012. Therefore, it is quite difficult for the latter's processor products to compete with the newer and more productive Intel products.

Chips positioning within LGA 1151. Their most important characteristics

Processor Socket LGA 2011-v3. Technical specifications

It is impossible to compare Intel vs AMD within this platform for the reason that this socket is out of competition in terms of speed today.LGA 2011-v3originally designed as a server socket, but later a lineup of chipsXeon was supplemented Core i7,aimed at the segment of already consumer PCs with unprecedented high performance.As noted earlier, integrated graphics in such systems should not be expected, and the RAM controller has 4 channels at once. Also, the indisputable advantages of this socket include the ability to install a CPU with 6 or even 12 cores, which also haveunlockedfactor. As a result, the performance margin of such computing systems allows their owners do not think about the hardware requirements for the next 3-4 years, for sure. Intel vs AMD processors in context LGA 2011-v3no comparison is allowed. There is simply a gap between them both in speed and in price. The latter for such PCs starts at several thousand dollars. But this is nothing special: such a PC is purchased for several years in advance and has excessive performance.

Basic parameters and capabilities

It's not entirely correct to compare Intel Core vs AMD processor solutions FX.While the former are constantly being updated and refined, the latter were released back in 2012 and since then there have been no changes within the AM3 + platform. As a result, the performance difference is huge.between these two platforms. AMD's flagship today can only compete on equal terms with the chips of the lineupCore i3.All processors within AM3 + have an unlocked multiplier, and as a result, they can and should be overclocked. Under the most favorable circumstances, with such CPUs, you can conquer the bar at 5 GHz. Also, without fail, this semiconductor crystal includes a 3-level cache. The RAM controller in this case is 2-channel, but, in contrastLGA 1151,cannot work with memoryDDR4, but only with DDR3.If you compare with each other“ Cor ” of the last generation, the advantage of the latter in terms of performance will be very large.The approximate positioning of AM3 + chips on niches is shown in the table below.

Positioning of AM3 + chips

FM2 + processor socket. Main platform for AMD hybrid chips

It is impossible to compare with each other processor parts vs AMD A-series. These processors are aimed at solving completely different tasks. The first of them allow you to create high-performance PCs, and the second - multimedia stations. But the situation changes dramatically when comparing graphics subsystems. The Core i5, alas, cannot boast of a powerful integrated graphics subsystem, but the AMD hybrid chip is equipped by default with a video card that even surpasses even the entry-level discrete accelerators in its capabilities. An important feature of this family of chips is that they are equipped with only two levels of cache memory.

Multimedia stations

Of course, within the niche of multimedia stations, it is possible to compare such central processors as Intel Core i5 vs AMD A10-XXXX, but this approach is not economically justified. Such computers put forward increased requirements for the graphics subsystem, and are not so demanding on the processor part of the PC. It is this combination of characteristics that the previously mentioned series of hybrid chips from AMD boasts. Another important feature is their very low cost, which corresponds to the 2-core CPU models from Intel. As a result, AMD has a dominant position in this highly specialized niche. The approximate configuration of such a PC is shown in the table below. The parameters of this computer will be quite enough for playing video, listening to music, working in office applications, and even some toys on it will run on the minimum settings.

Approximate complete set of multimedia station

Office computers

In this, the comparison between AMD FX vs Intel will be on the side of the latter. It has highly productive entry-level CPUs at a very democratic cost. The Celeron chip will look the most optimal within the framework of such a computing system. The approximate complete set of such a computer is shown in the following table.

Office computer 2016

Entry-level gaming PCs

Theoretically, within the framework of an entry-level gaming PC, you can also compare, for example, AMD FX - 6300 vs Intel "Kor Ay 3". But the difference in performance in this case will be fantastic. Moreover, the second CPU will win, which has only 2 real modules for performing computations instead of the one that has 6 paired blocks.

Therefore, in any case, the gaming system should be based on Intel chips. They are more expensive, but their performance is much better. Well, for gaming systems, the number of displayed images per second comes out on top, and here the difference between AMD FX vs Intel i3 will be simply staggering. The approximate complete set of such a computer is shown in the table below.

Complete set of basic gaming system

Average gaming systems

Comparing AMD FX-8350 vs Intel "Kor Ay 5" in terms of even a mid-level gaming PC in terms of the number of frames per second, we get a significant difference. In some cases, the difference will be 20-30 frames per second. This is unacceptable in dynamic games. Therefore, it is most correct to assemble a mid-level gaming system only on a full-fledged 4-core CPU from Intel. And it is best to look towards the i5-6600 chip. It is in combination with the GeForce 1060 that it will allow you to get excellent "Gameplay". It should be noted that the video card must be equipped with 6GB of RAM. Also, installing processors with an unlocked multiplier in such a system is not entirely justified. They are aimed at the premium segment and to work in tandem with the more expensive and efficient graphics card. Otherwise, the approximate configuration is shown in the table below.

Mid-level gaming system

Uncompromising gaming computers

If, even when comparing Intel Core i5 vs AMD, the indisputable advantage is already on the side of the first company, then in this case, in essence, the second company has no analogues. For the last 5 years, the premium segment of CPUs has been confidently occupied by the products of only one company - Intel, and even a comparison of AMD FX-9590 vs Intel LGA 2011-v3 does not give any chances for the products of the first company. This niche, as noted earlier, is targeted by Core i7 processors for the LGA2011-v3 socket. They can include up to 10 compute units, have an increased cache memory and an unlocked multiplier.

But the key difference in this case is the RAM controller, which can operate in 4-channel mode. As a result, the RAM subsystem is faster in this case, and there is no worthy competition for such computers yet.

PC for the computer enthusiast

Graphics stations

Even within this specialized niche, a comparison between AMD FX vs Intel Core i5 indicates that the products of the first company are outdated and lose in all respects. The base chip for such a PC is the i5-6400.

The approximate configuration of such a system is shown in the following table.

Graphics station complete set

What's next?

The next few months will be quite busy in the processor market. First, in January, Intel will update the lineup of its chips and present the 7th generation of its architecture, codenamed Core. In this case, no fundamental changes are expected. Bug fixes will be carried out, performance will be slightly improved and some new technologies will be added. Then, closer to the end of the first quarter, AMD will finally release its new socket, which it will call AM4. In this case, the changes will already be revolutionary. The chips will be manufactured using a new process technology, have an improved architecture and receive new technologies. These Zen processors should, in theory, restore parity in the CPU market. Only after that it will be expedient to revise the previously given computer configurations.

Outcomes

Let's sum up the results of the comparison of Intel vs AMD processor products carried out within the framework of this material. The only niche where the position of the second company is still strong is multimedia systems and budget and office PCs. Moreover, in the second case, Intel products look even more preferable. Another plus that AMD can boast of is the lower cost of its products. But is it worth saving the same $ 100 and getting an outdated system?even by today's standards. This is already obvious: a PC is bought for 3-5 years, therefore, in all other cases, when buying a new computing system, it is more correct to navigate when comparingspecifically for the products of the second company.