Today, every second, not counting every first, would not mind having a tablet. Often, future users, with a few exceptions, have a very vague idea of what, in fact, they are going to do with this gadget. Therefore, in social networks and on specialized forums, questions from the series “what to choose” are multiplying: which diagonal, or 3G, which is better - Windows or Android?
Here's the last point and try to figure it out.
Where to begin?
So, we choose the operating system for the future tablet. Let's start, as always, with philosophy - before choosing, you should still decide on the functionality that you need as a user of the device. If your entire user scenario is web surfing, in social networks and watching videos, any platform will do.
Although, in this case, the best choice will be more adapted to mobile use. If you plan to use the gadget for work, you need to compare not the platforms, but the availability of the necessary software or its analogues. Often some specialized software exists only for a specific operating system, which determines the final choice.
You need to understand what android difference from Windows. First of all, Android was developed from the very beginning as a mobile platform. Whereas Windows is still an adapted version of the desktop operating system. Naturally, this entails certain differences in operating scenarios. For example, the interface is better suited for the “green robot”. Although Windows 8.1 has done a lot of work aimed at improving the user experience in terms of interaction with the touch screen.
Frankly speaking, the comparison of mobile and desktop platforms is initially not very good. a good idea. Indeed, they are intended for different tasks. Nevertheless, Windows tablets are getting better, the system is also being “finished”, so for the average user, the question of choice is still relevant.
Software and hardware
On the one hand, since a Windows tablet is the same system that is installed on laptops and desktops, the software set is appropriate there. That is, everything that exists under Windows would pull the hardware. But even with this, the situation is improving, if earlier a powerful hardware component for a tablet on Windows almost always meant active cooling(and not the most powerful configurations, in all honesty, they sinned with this), then with the release of a new Intel line Core M this issue will be resolved soon.
Already now there are models on the new generation of processors, comparable in hardware characteristics with some ultrabooks.
Returning to the software, it should be noted that it is better not to try to play particularly demanding game projects on a Windows tablet, since the device is simply not designed for this. But more or less simple titles, casual games, timeless classics (hello, "Fallout" and "Heroes 3") and other not very resource-intensive games and programs will delight you. The same applies to application software - 3D modeling is definitely not for mobile gadget. But office tasks, easy photo processing, even in some cases - video, is quite within the power of the "tablet". Many do programming or web development on tablets, although they are unlikely to use it in this case as the main working machine.
On the other hand, the difference between systems from Microsoft and Google lies precisely in the fact that the latter is more optimized. We all know that when working with Windows periodically happen bad stories- then the drivers “fall off”, then the system just freezes, then in “ blue screen death" will start to leave randomly. Android is most often devoid of such problems - all applications, like the system itself, are more or less adapted to the hardware capabilities of devices. If the hardware is not designed to run "heavy" games or programs, then they will not start, which the system will kindly inform you about.
Summarizing, we can say that when choosing a tablet on Windows or Android, first of all, you should pay attention to the set that you plan to use. Other things being equal, this parameter will become decisive. The rest of the platforms this moment have comparable capabilities, even their famous office suite Microsoft recently released for Google OSes.
Previously, many were stopped by the lack of opportunity full-fledged work with documents and spreadsheets, this problem no longer exists. The choice is yours, and we hope it will be the right one!
A short video about what better than Windows or android:
Today we will compare with you and try to figure out which operating system the smartphone is better on - this is how you manage to notice the ignoble. There will always be lovers of both the first and second operating systems, shouting and screaming, defending the advantages of their smartphone on the current operating system and pointing out the competitor's shortcomings. Competitors Android and Windows today are not on last place, but when choosing a smartphone at the same price and specifications, the operating system will play an important role. What does the user have to compare today? Android or Windows Phone 7/8, what to choose Android or Windows task not simple, because both one and the second operating system have their advantages and disadvantages.
How do these mobile operating systems differ from each other? It is worth noting that the Android OS was developed on Linux kernel, which is backed by Google. And has such an attraction as source. This means that any user can reconfigure this operating system for themselves, make optimal settings by changing the system to personal use. In Android, you can completely change the interface, you can also add widgets to the desktop. IN free access there are several system assemblies, firmware for it, which will not be difficult to install them on the device. Windows Phone OS was developed by Microsoft as a successor (WinMobile) for smartphones, this operating system does not allow the user to full control above the device and the desktop is limited to live slabs. Which makes it less convenient.
RAM usage in Android increases system requirements system requirements. Weak processor and insufficient volume RAM slow down the operation of a smartphone on the Android platform, Windows Phone with exactly the same technical characteristics will not affect performance in any way. But it is worth noting that Microsoft operating systems work on devices with a certain type of processor. And this increases the cost of this device.
What simple user most important? Will he be able to download and install games and applications on his smartphone. There are no problems with Android as such. A wide variety of paid and free apps in Google Play market. And in general, thanks to Google, Android is much better adapted for surfing the Internet. Watching videos and listening to songs in the browser is a big plus for the user. It is worth noting that on Android there is such an opportunity as installing from file system which makes the system almost universal. For OS Windows quantity fewer applications have been created and it is impossible to third party developer install the product. Android can be easily connected to a PC without special software, which allows you to use the device for storage.
And so let's sum it up...
Android allows the user to refine the system, and is better suited to surfing the Internet.
Android gives full multitasking, Windows - not full.
Android consumes a lot of energy, requires as much free RAM as possible.
Windows hardware does not work on all devices.
Windows is not allowed to install applications from an unknown source.
Modern market mobile devices teeming with the most different names brands and operating systems. You can find the most bizarre and rare, ranging from iOS to Apple smartphones and ending with Blackberry OS. However, the undisputed leaders in this invisible marketing battle are the three most popular systems are Android OS, Windows Phone and iOS. However, first of all, it is worth comparing budget models with each other, without aiming at sky-high prices. Apple products. Therefore, this article will compare two leaders - operating systems from Microsoft and Google. Each of them is unique and convenient in its own way, but you will have to try hard to determine the winner.
Probably the most important criteria for the user should become such as:
- Interface and its customization.
It is worth considering each item separately.
Windows Phone-smartphones have a tile interface standard for Microsoft operating systems of the latest versions. It is ideal for tablet PCs, but on smartphones at first it looks bulky and uncomfortable, albeit stylish.
Android, on the other hand, has a very light, flexible and smooth interface. Latest Versions have a single animation and design style in all sections, which makes it addictive appearance systems more easily.
Both systems, however, are easily and simply customized for the user individually. And each of them is almost equally easy to learn. So it is problematic to identify the leader here.
Smartphones on the operating system from Microsoft in this nomination lose miserably. And there is a reason for this. Creating applications that can run on this OS is very limited and almost undeveloped. The result of this is only 250 thousand applications.
While Android drivers have at their disposal more than a million applications of various kinds. This is a huge plus, since the choice is quite wide. Besides free programs on this system still prevail over paid ones.
As for accessibility - on Windows Phone, install applications from third party sources without unnecessary problems will not work, the system will have to be hacked. Whereas Android quietly works with programs from any source, and not just from .
IN this case both systems are very productive, therefore, require more energy for their operation. And therefore they have such useful feature, like Battery Saver, showing apps that are consuming battery and tools to end them. In addition, smartphones with OS of both companies are equipped with batteries with sufficient energy reserves to “feed” demanding applications. Therefore, it is not possible to answer which system is better here.
Smartphones with both platforms receive updates periodically. And both platforms have such a problem as the "withering away" of older devices, that is, the unavailability of the latest packages for outdated models.
Windows Phone makes it impossible to update old smartphones from WP7 to 8 and even more so 8.1. However, system updates are released quite often, and are more stable, due to a single firmware supplier.
Android, on the other hand, consistently delivers updates to most of its smartphones, but older models still do not have such an opportunity - for them new platform may be too "heavy" and just not optimized. This also lies in the fact that the system has a lot of smartphone manufacturers, that is, many different firmware under the same name. And if some vendor decides not to support more old model- then from Google nothing will depend.
The availability of the system for “digging into the insides of the device” for some users is almost the key to a smartphone. And here the undisputed leader is. Since it was created on the initially free Linux kernel, the manufacturers decided not to change its credo and left the source code open to anyone. From here - great amount firmware for smartphones, the ability to easily register yourself as Root-rights and much more. Microsoft, on the other hand, is more conservative in this regard, so you won’t be able to dig deeper into the system - the source code is securely hidden from all those who suffer.
However, this plus easily turns into a minus when it comes to data security. Since Android is a system open to anyone, there are a lot of viruses written for it. But to protect yourself from them, it is enough to install special antivirus and do not install applications from third-party sources. But Windows Phone is more secure for two reasons - the platform is not as popular as Android, so creating viruses for it is not as profitable, and it has a closed code and the ability to install applications only through official store, that is, the virus will be more difficult to launch.
If the user needs a safe, albeit closed, smartphone, then Windows Phone is in the lead, but if you want freedom in working with the device, you can fence yourself in with antiviruses and purchase a device on the Android OS.
Cortana for Windows Phone integrates more deeply into the operating system. It is able to bind to any application, contact or event. If it is properly configured, it works more accurately and directionally than its competitors.
Google Now just started its development. It is just as integrated into the system as Cortana, but has much fewer features. It doesn't dig deep into files, but it performs well as a search engine.
Searching and processing information on the Internet completely changes the picture. According to research by Stone Temple Consulting, Google Now is the undisputed winner in this criterion. The agency compiled 3,086 questions that were asked to both assistants. And the study found that Google Now correctly recognized and answered 1,795 of them, or more than 50%, while Cortana almost failed: it processed only 630, or 20%.
When it comes to the accuracy of information in questions such as “How many years ago was Elvis Presley born” and the like, Google Now also leads here. The researchers considered the answer in the form of a date of birth to be incorrect, they needed a specific number - how many years ago? And it was Google Now that was able to perfectly handle such requests. The accuracy of the information was as much as 88%, compared to almost half that of Cortana - only 40%.
Summing up
There is no definite answer which operating system is better. In fact, each buyer will choose according to the functions and capabilities he needs. But if you briefly characterize each platform, then you can put it like this:
- Android is a flexible and open platform with many official and not so official applications. Leveled by some instability and openness to viruses.
- Windows Phone is a young but more secure platform that has its own features like Cortana, but fewer functions and various programs.
Each user must draw a conclusion for himself, what he needs more - openness or security, stability or the ability to "take everything into his own hands."
Those who have some knowledge of modern tablets, are familiar with such popular mobile platforms as Windows and Android. Each of them has considerable advantages and disadvantages.
Therefore, before making a choice in favor of an Android or Windows phone, you should take a closer look at each of them.
Let's start with Windows. As they say in the new version of the film "Hottabych": "Whatever one may say, you can't do without Vinda." Indeed, operating Windows system known to almost everyone, but mainly due to its popularity in the field of personal computers.
Its developer Microsoft company decided to keep up with current trends, and developed a variant of the operating system that runs on tablets and smartphones. In many ways, she inherited the characteristics of her "progenitor", OS Windows versions PC. This reliable system with good developer support.
Windows Phone systems are light on resources, so non-high-end phones with Windows Phone will do just fine. Works for them standard set applications from Microsoft, as well as other applications from this developer.
But there were some downsides here. many Windows users Phone may seem quite inconvenient, the system itself does not work too fast. For creating Windows Phone of each new version uses the core of a ready-made PC OS.
And here lies big disadvantage- sooner or later, passing to new version, Microsoft simply refuses to serve customers with outdated versions. A striking example of this is Windows Phone 7. Today, this system is no longer maintained, and is not updated from central servers. Worse than that, it cannot be upgraded to the new version.
Well, now let's move on to Android devices. Main Feature Android OS is its openness, thanks to which it was able to take 84% of the world market mobile platforms. System codes are available to any programmer, so today there is a faceless set of android systems of various modifications.
And here the bad thing is that many modifications do not compare with each other, work on the development of some of them stops, which blocks access to updates.
The android platform itself is quite multifunctional. It is a flexible system that will work well on both weak smartphones(light versions are installed there), and on modern "monsters" of the communicator market.
Many users note some randomness of design and access to functionality, but if we figure it out, we will get an excellent multifunction device with whom it will not be a shame to appear in society.
In general, it is difficult to make an unambiguous choice in favor of one of the leaders in the global mobile platform market, since this is just a matter of taste. However, the popularity of Android phones speaks for itself.
Regular appearance of new mobile technology puts any modern man before choosing. Which is better: OS-based devices. All these ios have their own merits and high performance. Android won with its innovation and reliability, but Windows does not want to lag behind its opponent, regularly offering customers an updated smartphone with many useful innovations. As a result, the position of the leader, which was previously confidently occupied by equipment with the Android system, is now occupied by two operating systems.
Smartphones and tablets based on Android, iOS and Windows: what's the difference?
For those who do not yet know what android is, there is a loud statistic: most smartphones that people buy today are not equipped with iOS, Symbian or windows. On the new phone Today, as a rule, the android OS is installed. This trend is not surprising. Google, which is the owner of this OS, creates favorable conditions for the use of android phones and tablets. As a result, the owner of a brand new smartphone or tablet buys not only smart technology but also comfortable conditions of use. These conditions are as close as possible to the needs of users and take into account their interests.
A distinctive feature of this platform is the variety of iOS versions and the ability to buy equipment at any price, ranging from budget models and ending with products from the premium segment. Android also offers over half a million apps, while Windows only has a hundred thousand add-ons. In addition, most applications from Microsoft can only be installed on a tablet and smartphone with iOS Windows 7. Android is more versatile in this matter: applications can be downloaded even on old equipment, not to mention the multitasking of the system.
An important difference that Android has is the ability to transfer files from your phone to your computer without long delays, with direct transfer of information. A smartphone that operates on the basis of Windows transmits data exclusively through the synchronization program. Models with Android have more democratic working conditions from smartphones: the user does not need any additional program to share and update files.
If Windows prefers to work only with proven and authorized sources and programs, then Android gives users more freedom in their actions. Not surprisingly, more than 80% of smartphones sold in the past year are equipped with Android.
But what about the disadvantages?
In addition to the differences, they have a big drawback: both systems do not terminate applications after they are closed. Therefore, the answer to the question of which system is better depends solely on the personal preferences of the owner of sensitive equipment. Last Windows time improved the quality and speed of their work. While Android still has a number of shortcomings in the stability of its work, Microsoft's OS does not crash and makes it possible to use any functions that are important to the user.
If Apple's iOS once pleased and pleasantly shocked its users with innovations, then in last years The company does not indulge customers with new products. The apple company is only improving the existing iOS features without creating fundamentally new products.
If Apple's iOS once pleased and pleasantly shocked its users with innovations, in recent years the company has not pampered customers with new products. The Apple company only improves the existing iOS capabilities without creating fundamentally new products.
